The City–County Relationship

Elmira's fiscal distress cannot be explained by the city alone. A shrinking share of the countywide sales tax and a decade of unwound shared-service agreements have moved tens of millions of dollars away from the city — this is where that story lives.

The Short Version
Two intertwined disputes, one direction of travel.
12.33% → 8.17% City's share of the countywide sales-tax pool, 2014→2024
~$22.8M Cumulative sales-tax revenue lost to the city since 2015
$58.8M → $71.9M Countywide pool grew while the city's slice shrank
Res. 15-114 2015 shared-services bundle now being unwound

Where the Sales Tax Goes
Chemung County collects the local sales tax and distributes it. In 2024 the City of Elmira — home to roughly a fifth of the county's population — received about 8.2% of the pool. The rest stays with the county government and the towns.
2024 countywide sales-tax pool, by recipient Reconstructed from NYS OSC filings: county collection (A1110) less what the county distributes to municipalities (A19854); the City of Elmira's slice is its A1120. Towns & villages are shown combined — per-municipality detail is not in OSC's county filing.
The Slice Shrank While the Pie Grew
The most damning chart in this story: the county's retained sales tax climbed steeply after the mid-2010s, while the city's receipts stayed essentially flat. Same economy, same shoppers — a different split.
County-retained sales tax (A1110) vs. city-received sales tax (A1120) NYS OSC Annual Update Document, 1995–2024.
How the loss is calculated. Had the city held its 2014 share (12.33%) of the growing pool, it would have collected roughly $22.8M more in sales tax from 2015 through 2025 than it actually did. That figure comes from the city's own analysis and matches the OSC receipts we independently pulled. It is comparable to several years of the city's entire fund balance — see the City Budget Explorer.

The Shared-Services Bundle (Resolution 15-114)
In February 2015 the city and county bundled five services together. A decade later most of that bundle is being unwound — each reversal shifting costs back onto the city.
DPW / Streets
Disputed
The county took on the city's street employees; the city paid $2M in year one, with the county absorbing an additional ~$400K/year until the city paid nothing. By 2025 the county was carrying ~$1.47M in salary and fringe. The county issued a termination notice on 6/30/25 (effective 12/31/25) and offered a four-year, 25%/year takeback — but the service was not actually cut; it continued under negotiation.
Status: unresolved dispute, not a completed termination.
Buildings & Grounds
Returned to city
Merged in January 2016 with five positions cut; later returned to the city. The city is repaying roughly $900K over five years (~$181K/year).
Health Insurance
Dropped 2024
The county dropped the shared health-insurance arrangement in 2024, returning that cost to the city.
Information Technology
Billing disputes
Shared since April 2009; marked by late and lumpy billing in 2022–2024.
Chamberlain Services
Part of the 2015 bundle
The fifth service tied to Resolution 15-114, alongside the four above.
Still being sourced. We are working to obtain the original Resolution 15-114 text and the Feb 15 2015 Public Works Shared Service Agreement, and to confirm the October 2025 legislature minutes. Figures here come from the city's October 2025 council presentation cross-checked against OSC data; see Data & Sources for what is documented versus still pending.
Why This Page Exists

It is tempting to read Elmira's frozen assessments and heavy exempt base as purely the city's own doing. They are real problems the city controls. But the revenue side of the ledger has been shaped just as much by decisions made at the county level — how the sales tax is split, and which shared services survive. A complete picture of Elmira's finances has to hold both. That is what Open Elmira is for.